I had a scary moment today when I realized how much I pride myself on my interest in development. There is something strangely reassuring in rattling off Human Development Index statistics for various countries, and then applying microeconomic policies to address them. There is something stylish about following a foreign sport, or conversing in another language, or obtaining an obtuse cultural factoid after having lived in a developing country for a year. Eventually, our work in international development can become our identity, one that we use to reassure ourselves of the fact that, yes, we are global citizens, and even more importantly, that our lives have been of use. If I didn’t say I was describing myself, I’d be lying.
There is nothing wrong with participating in another culture and relishing that experience; the danger comes when we lose sight of reality. When I first studied international development, I did it because it felt like the right thing to do, the necessary thing to do. “With great power comes great responsibility.” Gracias, Spiderman. Or in the words of Jesus as quoted by Luke: “To those whom much is given, much will be required.” I internalized these teachings like mantras, swooned over The Motorcycle Diaries and delighted in the legacy of Paul Farmer. I felt that through studying development, I too was part of a powerful process that is essentially good, healthy, and selfless. I entered each service encounter with the desire to reshape the world, to make a tangible impact, to help others. Yet in the end, I was really engaging in a form of cultural self-therapy, missing out on the more important lessons lying just below the surface.
Living in Trinidad has granted new perspective. I realize now that I know very little; still, my limited perceptions have changed drastically. Looking back on this year, and all my years of study and service, I recognize that the foreign communities I’ve tried to ‘serve’ have ultimately been much more generous, open, and of service to me than I ever could be to them. My presence abroad is transient, yet the impact that the foreign environment, the hospitality and the culture has upon me remains long after I fly home. Government exchange and volunteer programs like Fulbright are essential components of the American legacy, and serve as informal channels of cross-cultural education, and catalysts for projects that may ultimately benefit the host community. But let’s not kid ourselves; these programs also benefit U.S. interests; they are tools of foreign policy, scholarship incentives, and/or opportunities for U.S. citizens to develop themselves as much or more as they ‘develop’ communities.
That’s not to say that we cannot make a positive impact. We can, but only after better understanding the cultural environment in which we are working. A robust understanding cannot be accrued within a year or two (maybe ten years would be sufficient, but there would still be much to learn). Unfortunately, many development contracts do not allow for such a lengthy tenure; therefore it is essential that we approach our work with the dedication and the mentality of an eager student. The people we are ‘serving’ know much more about their development issues than we do. Certainly, we may possess technical knowledge and expertise gained through years of education, and should offer these skills if there is an evident need for them. Yet the most purposeful projects are conceived and directed by the community, and as development practitioners, we need to learn how to listen, to observe, and to lead from behind.
We must not engage in development processes simply to reassure ourselves or stroke our egos, but because development is a ubiquitous human challenge, one that we are all seeking to solve on different levels. Perhaps a good measure of our intent is asking ourselves how we will talk about our work when we return home. Will this be an opportunity to strut our worldly knowledge and experience, or can we take some of the learning we acquired and plug it back into our own communities? In fact, development work should never be dependent upon foreign location; someone who is genuinely interested in these processes should be willing and eager to work domestically, in rural Alabama, or in Detroit. I suspect that there are aspects of everyone’s hometowns that could use some development expertise, and in these instances, we are the locals who know best.
Perhaps the most important characteristic of an effective development practitioner is self-development, reassessing our motives and our means, and learning how to be of service without self-consciously serving. This only begins with an honest self-assessment and dogged awareness. It’s easy enough to spout out these qualities, but actually embodying them is an entirely different task. I can recognize this ideal, but am ridiculously far from it. Still, development work is never clean and easy; it’s a messy struggle, often without clear resolution or reward. It’s impossible to know our own development potential unless we work at it.